After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these types of systems. By lie recognition tools tested at the edge to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being employed in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to browse these systems and to follow their legal right for safety.
It also displays how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from getting at the channels of safeguard. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of the technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who all are regimented by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: www.ascella-llc.com/ whilst they help to expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.