step one. But really, into the genealogy, all of us knowthat for each code there’s an exclusion. A beneficial vexing part ofgenealogy would be the fact no one most knows just how to make use of the new conditions orrules which have people decisive adjective such as for instance always, maybe, probably,most likely, etcetera. It might be fascinating in the event the around most other examples ofjointures being made a-year otherwise one or two shortly after a well-known relationships time.
2. Is there an enthusiastic extant dispensation toward relationships away from ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes have been third cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, once taken from the fresh 5th LordClifford? That would restrict the wedding go out.
Arthur
Presumably, in the event that a beneficial dispensation are tried and you may granted, it might havebeen from the among the many adopting the, and might appear in the new correspondingregister publication, whether it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop off Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop from Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In the event your 10th Lord Clifford really does get married at the beginning of 1487 [state January] andhas E later on in that 12 months, do the chronology not work?
John arms kissbrides.com look at this now?
Elizabeth created in the late 1487, Henry born during the 1488/nine, Joan for the ,an such like. filling out this new brands of the post out-of . When the (a) thechronology nonetheless works; and (b) their particular marriage part was not reduced; thenwe simply have brand new 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s which is for the oppositionto this new conjecture you to she was a legitimate child.
6. About your 1505 pedigree: Is the Clifford daughters this new onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Are there anybody else? If that’s the case,wouldn’t you to definitely echo poorly about this document while the a resource?
Away from comparisons We have made of this new c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith the brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s Northern pedigrees, which happen to be
About c.1505 Relations pedigrees, this new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin a beneficial Clifford pedigree, but rather regarding St. John pedigree. Since the I’mnot accustomed the fresh St. John relatives, after the ‘s the recommendations asit appears from the c.1505 pedigree, since obtained from the brand new 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. article. The fresh new phrasing for the quotations is strictly whilst looks inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”Off my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess away from Somerset got three husbands.” By “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Lady this new King’s Mommy.” that has “The King.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest husband.” she had 3 daus & 2 sons:
A good. “Edith, married to Geoffrey Pole out of Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded towards the Lady Margaret, dau. off theDuke away from Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married so you’re able to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a unique child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously four pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Four daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, married in order to Thomas Kent, Esq. away from Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married to Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall with his brethren and sistren.” Having issueindicated, however named.C2. “Age, married to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Elizabeth, wedded earliest into the Lord Zouche; just after into LordScrope of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [by the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated although not titled.
Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, by “Lionel Lord Welles, history husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”